Magneto belt drive conversion

Information relating to the Matchless G80 or AJS Model 18 500cc Heavyweight.
Jdraper
Posts: 90
Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2011 9:41 am
Location: BUCKS UK

Magneto belt drive conversion

Post by Jdraper »

I seem to recall someone selling toothed belt drive conversion for heavyweight singles with N1 magnetos. Has anyone used one of these?

Jeremy
SPRIDDLER
Member
Posts: 8542
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2004 1:00 am
Location: WEST SUSSEX UK

Re: Magneto belt drive conversion

Post by SPRIDDLER »

I've no knowledge of that conversion but am interested as to why you want or need to do that....... The mag chain drive is rarely problematic.....
:?

EDIT:
It has just occurred to me that perhaps you are referring to a belt conversion for the primary drive on a mag ign engine. This has been mentioned quite a few times on here and the general considerations are:
The width of the belt requiring a wider/modified outer chaincase...?
The clutch rollers need oil.
Driving the dynamo chain...? (Some mag ign bikes had an alternator).

A further (yet irrelevant) thought...
The N1 has manual advance/retard.
Your '55 would have been fitted originally with an auto advance/retard mag. An over-tight chain can inhibit the functioning of the auto A/R unit. The necessary tension required for a belt would be undesirable.
'There is a tide in the affairs of men
Which taken at the flood............'
Jdraper
Posts: 90
Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2011 9:41 am
Location: BUCKS UK

Re: Magneto belt drive conversion

Post by Jdraper »

No, it was the magneto drive and I have tracked down a clip on you tube -



I suppose I was thinking the same question as to 'why', but I can think of a few plusses - slightly more accurate timing, less chaos if a chain snaps, slightly quieter, no oil/grease required so cleaner. There are a number of plus points that come to mind. I was asking if anyone had tried the kit and if so, what benefits have they seen. Unfortunately my 18S is a '55, so has an SR1 with auto advance unit so the kit, as described wouldn't fit, but I do have a N1-4 lurking somewhere...

Jeremy
SPRIDDLER
Member
Posts: 8542
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2004 1:00 am
Location: WEST SUSSEX UK

Re: Magneto belt drive conversion

Post by SPRIDDLER »

The link doesn't work for me.
Youtube error (640x431).jpg
However, they're all logical plusses in theory but IMHO entirely unnecessary for practical purpose.
In my experience it's a solution to problems that don't exist....
Sufficiently accurate timing is easily achievable with a chain.
Grease doesn't leak out of the chain housing.
I've never had a mag chain break (they are endless and under minimal stress).
I can't hear the chain noise above my valve gear chatter and rattling dentures ;)

Happy to be corrected though.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
'There is a tide in the affairs of men
Which taken at the flood............'
Jdraper
Posts: 90
Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2011 9:41 am
Location: BUCKS UK

Re: Magneto belt drive conversion

Post by Jdraper »

You've got the right link from your screen shot, looks like a problem elsewhere in the digital domain. Try cutting & pasting into a new window..

Just got my '55 back on the road after a (very, very) long layoff. I'd forgotten why we need lockwire on the tank bolts.

Jeremy
56G80S
Member
Posts: 3354
Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2005 10:45 pm
Location: N YORKS UK

Re: Magneto belt drive conversion

Post by 56G80S »

Link worked fine - too well. Just lost 30 minutes watching run on clips about work done on Matchless engines!

Johnny B
Dave T_LAPSED
Posts: 157
Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2016 7:19 pm
Location: CALVADOS FRANCE

Re: Magneto belt drive conversion

Post by Dave T_LAPSED »

The belt does look very spindly, I think I would rather trust a chain. What is the service life of the belt, replacement will be mileage or time dependent, has anyone ever changed a chain in good condition simply because it was old :?:
56G80S
Member
Posts: 3354
Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2005 10:45 pm
Location: N YORKS UK

Re: Magneto belt drive conversion

Post by 56G80S »

Good question, Dave.

Purely for the age reason I bought one the other year to replace the "real" Renolds that was on when I bought the Matchless back in the mid '70s. There was almost no stretch at all.

But the Regina chain was a bit tight and I had to "adjust" the earlier (incorrect) barrel to move the SR1 back. And then refitted the Renolds chain! To quote Rob Harknett, it will outlast me and I wasted my money.

Johnny B
Dave T_LAPSED
Posts: 157
Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2016 7:19 pm
Location: CALVADOS FRANCE

Re: Magneto belt drive conversion

Post by Dave T_LAPSED »

Well, I'm glad that it's not just me that does things like that, keep up the good work :D
SPRIDDLER
Member
Posts: 8542
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2004 1:00 am
Location: WEST SUSSEX UK

Re: Magneto belt drive conversion

Post by SPRIDDLER »

For whatever reason the link opens fine now. It's a tidy piece of work and wouldn't be harmful.
A belt conversion would be a more useful alternative for the dynamo drive chain as it would probably do less damage if it broke or clashed with the primary drive chain. Obviously the dual engine sprocket makes a dynamo belt drive a bit of a challenge.
I've not had a dynamo or mag chain break, nor have I replaced or had a camshaft chain break on any of my MG's and other cars but a main dealer-replaced cam belt broke after 6 months on my Ford Sierra with very costly consequences.
'There is a tide in the affairs of men
Which taken at the flood............'
Locked