I'm new to the game. My 1953 G3LS had its front brake torque bar on the right side and therefore in compression and therefore dangerous. It had a timing lever installed on the wrong side of the 'bars. Both errors corrected. Pull the timing lever back most of the way and you don't end up with painful neck muscles on attemting a start. It's retarded pulled back and advanced when pushed. The mag has its control cable on the forward side
My AJ Bitsa has a 1953 G80 engine with the same mag set-up at the front of the engine but has its control cable coming off the mag on the other side - the cylinder side. As a result the timing lever works in the opposite sense.
Is there a convention? Is it just another case of "If it can be wrongly asembled it will be" ?
Timing lever direction convention
-
- Posts: 10
- Joined: Sun May 26, 2019 11:31 am
- Location: Derybyshire
-
- Member
- Posts: 629
- Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2017 12:05 pm
- Location: DEVON UK
Re: Timing lever direction convention
I don't think there was ever a convention, just different designs. It's more a case of "if you can use it wrongly, someone will".Antoni wrote:
Is there a convention? Is it just another case of "If it can be wrongly asembled it will be" ?
Malc
-
- Member
- Posts: 8578
- Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2004 1:00 am
- Location: WEST SUSSEX UK
Re: Timing lever direction convention
Bikes made up to Aug 31st 1953 were '53 models. After that it would be a '54 model.Antoni wrote:I'm new to the game. My 1953 G3LS ...........The mag has its control cable on the forward side
My (ex-Plumstead May '54 G3LS) with an N1 mag has the A/R cable entering on the cylinder side.
I believe mine - 2 previous owners (shipped new to the Rhodesian Police then to previous owner living 10 miles from me) has its original mag.
No idea why they should differ. Possibly a hangover from earlier Matchless singles that had the mag located behind the cylinder?
'Groily' is the mag guru who may have the answer...........if there is one
'There is a tide in the affairs of men
Which taken at the flood............'
Which taken at the flood............'
- GOLDSTAR
- Member
- Posts: 2521
- Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2003 1:00 am
- Location: KENT UK
Re: Timing lever direction convention
G80cs comp mag, slack wire advance, DB32 Goldstar tight wire advance, confusing so changed it to slack wire advance[,damn lot of trouble to do]
following these two I purchased an Ariel W/ng tight wire advance it can damn well stay as such, now the Velocette a sophisticated and civilised machine, slack wire advance, ah thats better ! kind regards
following these two I purchased an Ariel W/ng tight wire advance it can damn well stay as such, now the Velocette a sophisticated and civilised machine, slack wire advance, ah thats better ! kind regards
-
- Member
- Posts: 2164
- Joined: Thu Jul 04, 2002 1:00 am
- Location: NORMANDIE FRANCE
Re: Timing lever direction convention
Not sure if there's any real convention here, but slack and tight wire advance, for clockwise and anti-clockwise rotation from drive end are all options! Personally,like Goldstar, I prefer slack advance if cable routing permits, as the default position if the lever slips at the bars is full advance. But horses for courses. Some makers seemed to adopt one, others t'other.
Some mags will have had their cb end housings changed over the years, to alter the input side of the cable.
Some mags will have had their direction of rotation changed too probably.
Some have even had their HT pick-up moved across from one side to the other and the original blanked off - but that a least is an obvious mod!
Only the Parts Lists can really tell us what went originally on what. And even then, it needs the ID tag not to have been changed over time to say something different from original. And the Parts Lists are an excruciating read, as those of us who pour over them often can attest!
The good news though, is that almost anything can be made to work fine on almost anything, either direction of rotation, cable routing permitting.
Some mags will have had their cb end housings changed over the years, to alter the input side of the cable.
Some mags will have had their direction of rotation changed too probably.
Some have even had their HT pick-up moved across from one side to the other and the original blanked off - but that a least is an obvious mod!
Only the Parts Lists can really tell us what went originally on what. And even then, it needs the ID tag not to have been changed over time to say something different from original. And the Parts Lists are an excruciating read, as those of us who pour over them often can attest!
The good news though, is that almost anything can be made to work fine on almost anything, either direction of rotation, cable routing permitting.
-
- Posts: 10
- Joined: Sun May 26, 2019 11:31 am
- Location: Derybyshire
Re: Timing lever direction convention
Clear info given.
There is no convention. There's only manufacturer's convenience when making a particular motorcycle model.
Thanks each.
There is no convention. There's only manufacturer's convenience when making a particular motorcycle model.
Thanks each.
-
- Posts: 663
- Joined: Thu Feb 27, 2014 9:27 am
- Location: Kent, England
Re: Timing lever direction convention
I have a number of old British bikes and they are all manual A/R and I can never remember which way round advance and retard is. Having had a few painful kick backs I have now painted a small red dot on each A/R lever showing the direction of advance.
Simples.... no more limping around
Jim
Simples.... no more limping around
Jim
Too old to Rock and Roll but too young to die.
1952 G80 rigid, 1960 G12 DL / Watsonian Monza, 1954 G80S.
1952 G80 rigid, 1960 G12 DL / Watsonian Monza, 1954 G80S.