On my 350 G3L I Am refitting the cylinder compression plate to the crankcase and the gasket set I have has only one paper seal. When I removed the compression plate there were jointing seals on both sides.
The manual says take paper seal and to smear jointing compound on one side only and fit to crankcase.
This would leave the cylinder and compression plate without an oil tight seal surely?
What is the recommended method?
I would have been inclined to make another seal and put seals on both sides of the compression plate.
Any help would be appreciated. RR
Cylinder base plate seal
-
- Posts: 28
- Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2010 12:52 pm
- Location: EXETER UK
-
- Posts: 7721
- Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2005 6:01 pm
- Location: UK
Cylinder base plate seal
recommended method is the factory advice surely?
but then again I always wipe each side of both gaskets with wellseal.
If I feeling righteous I just use grease.
but then again I always wipe each side of both gaskets with wellseal.
If I feeling righteous I just use grease.
-
- Posts: 2337
- Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2005 10:45 pm
- Location: victoria AUSTRALIA
Cylinder base plate seal
Why not throw the plate and get rid of that sidevalve power!
-
- Posts: 219
- Joined: Tue Oct 30, 2007 4:15 pm
- Location: NSW AUSTRALIA
Cylinder base plate seal
I can remember putting a gasket on both sides of the compression plate when I owned a '51 G80. Didn't realise (at the time) that you could leave the plate out!
-
- Posts: 2337
- Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2005 10:45 pm
- Location: victoria AUSTRALIA
Cylinder base plate seal
All that power you're missing out of! It does make a difference.
-
- Posts: 307
- Joined: Fri May 21, 2010 5:05 am
- Location: FRANCE
Cylinder base plate seal
Don't remove the compression plate if there is the slightest ridge at the top of the barrel. Also as there was a gasket on either side of the plate when you dismantled it you should reassemble it with two gaskets for the above reason. If however you've got no lip whatsoever then I would follow Wilco's advice, assuming the plate is not particularly thick and that the bottom end is in good condition.
Ian
Ian
-
- Member
- Posts: 1902
- Joined: Wed Jan 01, 1992 12:00 am
- Location: SURREY UK
Cylinder base plate seal
Should you decide to remove thebase plate you will also have to take into account the pushrod tube rubber gaskets on the top of the tubes.
These will need to be shortened by the same thickness of the plate (approximately 1/16" I think) otherwise the tops of the tube will collapse inwards due to the rubber gaskets being over compressed.
These will need to be shortened by the same thickness of the plate (approximately 1/16" I think) otherwise the tops of the tube will collapse inwards due to the rubber gaskets being over compressed.
-
- Posts: 28
- Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2010 12:52 pm
- Location: EXETER UK
Cylinder base plate seal
Thanks for all your advice fellas:-
I know you can leave the plate out, but I am not inclined to do that, even though there is no bore wear. The manual is explicit in what parts to remove if you leave out the plate. So I have decided to make another paper seal and let Hylomar take care of the leaks - being new to working on motorcycle engines I just wanted to see if in the light of 68 years since it was made there have been any advances on what the 1941 manual says - apparently not!!
I know you can leave the plate out, but I am not inclined to do that, even though there is no bore wear. The manual is explicit in what parts to remove if you leave out the plate. So I have decided to make another paper seal and let Hylomar take care of the leaks - being new to working on motorcycle engines I just wanted to see if in the light of 68 years since it was made there have been any advances on what the 1941 manual says - apparently not!!